The streets of downtown Los Angeles have recently turned into a scene of escalating tension and disorder. Caught in the chaos was 9News Australia U.S. correspondent Lauren Tomasi, whose live broadcast took a dramatic turn when she was struck by a police-fired rubber bullet. This shocking moment vividly highlights the risks journalists face while covering volatile protests.
On Sunday, June 8, protesters gathered in growing numbers in response to federal immigration raids conducted by ICE. What started earlier in the day as small rallies escalated into a large, unruly crowd near the Metropolitan Detention Center, with some demonstrators smashing vehicles, setting fires, and demanding attention.
In the fray, Lauren Tomasi delivered live reports in front of the crowd. She calmly narrated the scene, describing police on horseback advancing and deploying rubber bullets to scatter protestors.
Then, as she concluded a live segment, microphone still in hand, an officer raised a launcher and fired at her, hitting her in the leg at close range. Her startled exclamation and immediate concern for her safety were captured on camera. A voice in the background reacted in disbelief, yelling, “You just f***ing shot the reporter!”
Lauren Tomasi, alert and resilient, reassured her team on the scene. “I’m good, I’m good,” she confirmed, though shaken by the incident. Video footage indeed depicts the projectile’s impact and the urgency that followed.
9News Australia later issued a statement affirming that Lauren and her camera operator had escaped serious harm and would continue covering unfolding developments. The network emphasized the importance of frontline journalism and expressed concern over the dangers reporters encounter in such volatile situations.
The incident sparked swift international outrage. Australian Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young condemned the rubber-bullet strike, urging Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to press U.S. officials for answers. She reminded leaders that freedom of the press remains essential to a healthy democracy.
Ahead of related diplomatic discussions, Prime Minister Albanese described the scene as “horrific” and stressed that Lauren Tomasi, clearly marked as press, should never have been targeted. He also confirmed that the Australian government had raised the matter with U.S. authorities.
Back in Los Angeles, Mayor Karen Bass appealed for calm among residents and protesters. She called for peaceful conduct and warned against allowing political motivations to fuel further unrest. Meanwhile, Governor Gavin Newsom and Mayor Bass publicly opposed President Trump’s decision to deploy the National Guard.
The larger protests, ignited by federal immigration enforcement, had already prompted the LAPD to declare the gathering an unlawful assembly. Warnings were issued through official channels to clear the area around the Civic Center. In response, President Trump reportedly directed the LAPD to bring in reinforcements, including thousands of National Guard troops.
Footage and eyewitness accounts suggest the shooting was deliberate. One viewer remarked on social media: “Directly aims at her… It wasn’t a missed shot. It was purposeful!” Others called for accountability, demanding that the officer involved face consequences.
The Los Angeles Police Department, through Chief Jim McDonnell, acknowledged the incident. He expressed concern over harm to media personnel during crowd-control actions and said an internal investigation was underway.
Despite the alarming nature of the event, Lauren Tomasi has chosen not to retreat. She resumed her reporting with composure, noting, “This is just one of the unfortunate realities of reporting on these kinds of incidents.” She emphasized the need to keep covering the story for those watching from afar, urging continued attention to what’s unraveling in LA.
As attention remains fixed on Los Angeles, this episode underscores the delicate balance between maintaining order and preserving civil liberties, particularly the protection of free speech and press access. It prompts urgent questions: Should journalists be in rubber-bullet range during civil unrest? What protocols must law enforcement follow to avoid harming innocent, clearly marked press?
0 Comments