How to Create a Lasting Nuclear Waste Containment Solution.

3 min


ADVERTISEMENT

Nuclear waste remains toxic for thousands of years. Building a storage facility to safely contain it for millennia is a complex challenge.

On a chilly summer day, I descend 1,500 feet underground in northeastern France. Here, in the Champagne region, it feels much warmer. The fluorescent lights are bright, and the air is dry. Dust fills my mouth, and the heavy emergency respirators remind me of the dangers down here.

As I navigate the rough, crisscrossing tunnels of the underground laboratory, I start to feel disoriented. The hum of hidden equipment and the absence of people make it harder to find my way back to the lift.

Turning a corner, I discover a vast chamber. For a moment, it resembles a tomb of the pharaohs. But this space has been carved from rock to store some of the most radioactive substances on Earth.

Designing and building structures that will last for 100,000 years and contain dangerous materials is no small feat. Four hours east of Paris, a 2.4 km tunnel system is home to various scientific experiments and construction tests. France’s National Radioactive Waste Agency (Andra) conducts these to gain regulatory approval for a geological disposal facility (GDF).

GDFs are among the largest underground structures humanity will build. Many are planned or under development in countries like the UK, France, Sweden, and Finland. Finland has already constructed the first deep geological disposal facility for spent fuel and is in the trial phase. Sweden will soon start building a GDF at Forsmark, and a similar facility is expected in France soon.

Image by Unsplash

These facilities are designed to contain highly radioactive and long-lived waste. Currently, this waste is stored on the surface at sites like Sellafield in the UK and La Hague in France. It includes components of nuclear reactors, spent fuel, and reprocessing byproducts.

The design process for a GDF takes decades. “Licensing one of these facilities takes over 20 to 30 years,” says Jacques Delay, a scientist at the French facility. After that, operations will last around 100 years before the site is sealed, followed by centuries of monitoring.

Finding a suitable site for a GDF is crucial. Engineers like Amy Shelton of the UK’s Nuclear Waste Services examine geological data to identify locations where rocks can safely confine nuclear waste for over 100,000 years. Ideal rocks include granite and clay, but finding the right location can be challenging. A site might be too close to aquifers or susceptible to future geological changes.

Some countries have advantages. “Swedish and Finnish bedrock is stable in terms of seismic activity,” says Anna Porelius from Sweden’s nuclear waste management organization. “It’s been intact for over 900 million years.”

Community involvement is also vital. Many communities volunteer to host GDFs for potential investments and jobs. However, public perception of the nuclear industry can affect support. In Finland, residents have a positive view due to decades of nuclear power use, unlike experiences in the UK.

Missteps can lead to public protests, as seen in Sweden during the site selection process. It’s also tempting to repurpose disused mines for storage. However, these mines weren’t built with the necessary precision for high-level waste.

Building a new facility allows for better planning. “In Finland, we build underground to escape the weather,” says Pasi Tuohimaa of Posiva Oy. The design of a GDF depends on the thickness of the rock, the type of waste, and its heat output.

Image by Josue Isai Ramos Figueroa for Unsplash

Physical barriers are essential to prevent radiation escape. These barriers include container designs and surrounding rock types. Critics worry about their long-term effectiveness.

Transportation methods also pose challenges. Lifts could get stuck or malfunction, so a ramp with a gentle slope may be safer. A combination of both might be best.

Collaboration among nations can streamline designs, as seen with Sweden and Finland’s shared KBS3 model. They benefit from consistent rock types, whereas the UK is still exploring potential geology.

Technological change is another concern. “It’s impossible to predict what technology will be available in 20 to 200 years,” Delay explains. The facility must be adaptable and resilient.

French engineers have tested safety features with a funicular system for transporting containers. They’ve even developed robots capable of moving waste canisters in emergencies.

Sweden is further along in its plans. The repository will eventually feature around 60 km of tunnels housing over 6,000 copper canisters of spent fuel. Custom-designed machines will place these canisters deep in the rock.

However, technology doesn’t always evolve as expected. “Designing for the future requires a focus on repairability and adaptability,” says Hyatt.

Finally, the principle of retrievability complicates GDF design. In France, any deposited waste must be retrievable during the operational phase. As sealing progresses, retrieval becomes more difficult.

While the timeline for these projects is lengthy, the motivations for specialists working on them remain strong. They understand the importance of creating a safe and secure future for nuclear waste storage.


Sara

0 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Verified by MonsterInsights